Torturing Afghan Detainees R Us

In the ‘whatever is begun in anger ends in shame’ department, Canada risks descending into pariah status with the latest revelations of complicity in torture in Afghanistan.

For all those who had trepidation about the moral implications of Canadian participation in the Afghan war became more nervous with yesterday’s headline in newspapers:

“All detainees were tortured, all warnings were ignored”

Wow. This testimony was given by Canadian diplomat and whistle-blower Richard Colvin, to a parliamentary committee in Ottawa. Colvin had served in a diplomatic capacity in Afghanistan for 17 months. This is the first time a government official has made such far-ranging allegations of complicity in torture by the Canadian Forces and the Canadian government.

There has been suspicion for some time that some Afghani detainees may have been tortured after they were transferred from Canadian to Afghan Army custody. Colvin’s testimony suggests that the transfer of detainees — to probable or certain torture — was a widespread Canadian practice. If true, it would greatly discredit Canada’s conduct in Afghanistan and reduce its legitimacy as an occupying force.

The Canadians Forces apparently detain larger numbers of people in their military operations than do their allies. A large proportion of these detainees may be innocent of any crime.

Clearly, complicity in torture is a war crime. Armies of occupation such as Canada’s must follow rules as defined in part by the Geneva Conventions. If Canadian Forces were complicit in the torture of detainees, were aware of their involvement and still allowed the torture to occur, they are guilty of war crimes.

The Conservative government has experienced little political cost from previous torture allegations — or indeed from the entire Afghanistan war — from either the Canadian public or the opposition parties. The issue, oddly, gets little traction in Canadian politics. Previously, the Conservative government has managed to sweep all allegations of complicity in torture under the rug. It is unclear whether, with these new allegations by Colvin, they will be able to continue to do this.

What these allegations mean for Canada is that they reflect poorly on the political leadership of Canada, on the Canadian Armed Forces and on Canada as a whole. They conflict completely with the commonly-provided narratives about the roles Canadians play in Afghanistan.

Canadian politicians see these allegations as a domestic political issue and have failed to acknowledge their international implications — such as severe risks to Canada’s reputation.

This head-long rush to possible pariah status is an odd, self-defeating behavior on Canada’s part. It has similarities to the Canadian government’s recent policy on greenhouse gas emissions, which many view as obstructionist, disingenuous and fundamentally lacking in leadership.

One of the main reasons that the Canadian government has given about why Canada invaded Afghanistan in the first place was to raise the human rights conditions for its residents. At first this did not appear to be difficult to achieve given that the previous Taliban regime had an abysmal human rights record and was itself a pariah regime within the international community.

It now appears that the  Karzai government in Afghanistan is breathtakingly-corrupt and has little interest in improving the human rights conditions of Afghans.

The NATO occupying forces in combination with the Karzai government may have achieved what would seem to be impossible — to create a regime worse for the average Afghan than was the previous Taliban regime.

Posted in Canada, Peace | Leave a comment

Charles and Camilla visit Hamilton!

Charles and Camilla at Dundurn Castle, Hamilton

Charles and Camilla at Dundurn Castle, Hamilton

Hamilton proved not to be a hotbed of republican sentiment last week on November 9, 2009 when Prince Charles, the Prince of Wales and his wife Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, visited Dundurn Castle.

Dundurn Castle (completed 1835) was built as the stately home of Sir Allan MacNab, an influential and wealthy settler of Hamilton who just so happens to be the great-great-great grandfather of Camilla. Dundurn Castle is now a well-loved civic museum in west Hamilton. It is one of the most attractive 19th century buildings in Canada and as a museum gives an excellent idea of the upstairs-downstairs life in an early Canadian estate.

Dundurn Castle is located a few blocks from where I live, which made it for me the most convenient royal visit ever. I simply had to stroll over to its grounds and wait for the royal excitement to build. And build it did. Hamiltonians, as it turned out, were very excited to see Charles and Camilla.

We don’t get many royal visits here in Hamilton so we didn’t know quite what to expect. Would we be dazzled by the celebrity status of the visiting royals [yes!], would the royals make us feel unworthy and unloved and treat us like residents of a simple steel town [no!], would we tire of the artificiality of an heir to a foreign crown visiting a former colony [not at all!]. We lapped it all up. There was nary a voice of dissent; no discouraging words were heard. Overall, it appeared to be a very successful visit.

I think the fact that Dundurn Castle has a direct family connection to Camilla had a positive effect on the mood of the visit. I think it would be impossible to predict this result prior to their visit. Through skill, some shared history and good luck, Charles and Camilla struck gold this time. They encountered something for which all royals must occasionally yearn: an adoring crowd of loyal subjects.

I am by no means a monarchist but I must confess I too enjoyed the royal visit. I enjoyed the fact that it brought publicity and recognition to the charms of Dundurn Castle and Hamilton. Charles and Camilla appeared to be a stable middle-aged couple who are happy in their own skin. They are not glamour-pusses in the manner of Diana but they appeared to be quite skilled at small-talk with the locals, of asking pertinent questions and of understanding to perfection their mind-numbingly ceremonial role.

In anticipation of the royal visit to Canada there were several newspaper articles detailing how Canadians were quite apathetic about the monarchy, didn’t think much of Charles, or had no idea that Canada was configured as a constitutional monarchy. But based on my experience during the royal visit, I don’t think Charles should worry about his family’s future prospects in Canada. Canadians are clearly in no hurry to get rid of their monarchy. There is a greater chance that Canada will vote to become a Vegan Republic or a Bolshevik Protectorate than that it will cease to be a parliamentary democracy with a British monarch as Head of State. The concept of the ‘Crown’ is deeply embedded in the Canadian system of government and psyche; it would be hard to imagine Canada without it, regardless of what its citizens might think about any one particular heir or monarch.

The whole concept of a ‘constitutional monarchy’ seems to be a little counter-intuitive. You would think that monarchies would tend to be deeply conservative places, but there are so many exceptions to this rule (e.g. the Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc.) that it doesn’t appear to hold water. Republics are not necessarily more progressive and can sometimes veer in odd directions, as our neighbour to the south demonstrates. There is some evidence that Canada’s position as a stable, sometimes progressive democracy is not only in spite of its monarchist history but also because of it. Or maybe this is just the Kool-Aid talking.

Prince Charles meeting the crowd at Dundurn Castle

Prince Charles meeting the crowd at Dundurn Castle

Charles is the scion of a wealthy, multi-national corporation who has spent most of his life waiting to become a king. It appears though that he spends his money in interesting ways. In architectural circles he is notorious for his interventionist and anti-modernist stance, but overall as an heir apparent, he seems harmless enough–perhaps even progressive in some ways. He is a patron of many causes, some of which could directly benefit Canada, such as heritage architecture, urban sustainability, environmentalism, support for disadvantaged youth, organic farming and alternative medicine. Interestingly, the current Conservative government in Ottawa has absolutely no interest in such causes. Clearly, their brand of conservatism is quite different from Charles’s.

Posted in Hamilton | Leave a comment

Fall of the Berlin Wall

The fall of the Wall in 1989 was a joyous occasion for me. I lived in West Berlin in 1981-2 and understood the brutality, ugliness and the simple lack of convenience that the Wall brought to the great city of Berlin. The Wall was an interesting geo-political artifact of the Cold War but it was also very offensive, as walls that imprison populations tend to be.

I visited East Berlin several times when I was living in West Berlin. East Berlin was a strange but fascinating place. At that time I never thought the Wall would fall. I thought that this was just how Berlin was always going to be: a divided city with a curious no-man’s land snaking right through its centre.

Checkpoint Charlie, which was the main crossing into the East, was a wonderfully arcane place of switch-back paths, barbed wire, clanking doors and stern-faced East German border guards. It was like a movie set for all the bad Cold War movies you had ever seen. Checkpoint Charlie was a bit frightening, but it was also so comically repressive it almost fell into self-parody. You almost expected the Monty Python gang to burst in at any moment to perform the Spanish Inquisition sketch.

Once you got into East Berlin, there was an eerie quiet and sense of paranoia. Few people were out on the streets. The goods in the shops were minimal–except that slightly stale loaves of heavy dark bread seemed to be in abundance. The locals were drably dressed and looked at Westerners with suspicion.

In West Berlin the scene was completely different. It was spread out, almost in a North American style, and had surprisingly large amounts of green space (it still does). It had some comfortable leafy suburbs such as Tegel and Dahlem. The ritzy neighbourhood of Charlottenburg formed its cultural centre. But West Berlin as a city seemed a bit unfocused, in spite of its dominant urban axes such as the Ku’damm and Bismarkstrasse. That was because the true jewels of the city lay east of the Brandenburg Gate in East Berlin. East Berlin held the historical, central core of Berlin and was where most of the grand, old buildings were situated. This is something I had little knowledge of prior to my first visit there.

In the central district of East Berlin called Mitte there were neoclassical treasures such as the Museum Island and Schinkel’s Altes Museum. You ran into these monuments after about a ten minute walk from Checkpoint Charlie. For a naive Canadian the existence of so many massive, historical buildings was very surprising and a bit humbling. But beyond the architectural and urban attractions of the east, East Berlin didn’t mean that much to me beyond being a Cold War theme park. I never felt that atomic annihilation between East and West was imminent. I never thought that the Communists were a serious threat to Western Europe. I believed that the next zone of world conflict would be far from the pleasant plains of central Europe.

But like most other people, I was astounded when the Wall fell.

Right-wing politicians like Reagan, Thatcher and Bush pretended to play some pivotal role in the whole process of the Fall of the Berlin Wall. But I think they just happened to be in power at the time when Communism was falling all on its own. Communist regimes were notorious for their internal weaknesses such as low productivity, low worker morale, environmental degradation, the high cost of feeding an expensive military/police state, and their isolation from natural markets and investment capital in the West. In my opinion, Communism fell because it was spectacularly unsuited for generating wealth and in creating acceptable standards of living for ordinary people, not because of anything ideologically-driven politicians from the West may have said or done.

In its time though, the Berlin Wall did create much misery. Many who tried to escape over the Wall were shot in the back. The Wall was there to keep East Germans in, not to protect them from outsiders. Life in East Germany was oppressive for all except those with the greyest of personalities. Even more surprising was the fact that East Germany was the most advanced and prosperous of the Communist countries. If life in East Berlin was bad, just imagine how miserable life in Minsk or Wroclaw must have been.

Almost everyone was overjoyed when the Wall fell in 1989. However, as many commentators have noted, even though the disappearance of the Wall itself was undoubtedly a good thing, the reunification of Germany and the social impact of this reunification has not been all good for all concerned. We could see this foreshadowing during the time we spent in the newly-unified Berlin in 1991: not all was right about reunification, or how it had played out in Berlin.

When the Berlin Wall fell, my wife and I were living in Toronto. About a year later we decided to move to Berlin, which we did in the Spring of 1991. We stayed about six months and then moved back to Canada. We lived in the former East Berlin in an apartment at Erbeskopfweg 11, in the Berlin suburb of Nordend, just north of Pankow. It was a charming place in its own way. Our neighbours there had not seen too many Canadians so we were a bit of a novelty.

The fall of the Wall meant that one political system had been taken over completely by another. It was not two systems getting together and working out what would be acceptable to both sides. It was one side having all the cards with the other side having none. A sense of triumphalism emanated from the West: the Communists had lost and the West had won. This sense infiltrated ordinary people, on both sides.

Triumphalism tends to be a negative emotion. When one country triumphs over the other, the sensibilities of the losing side tend to be given short shrift. The Easterners had suffered since WWII in an unusually repressive police state. Now–even though they could buy as many bananas as they wanted–they had to suffer some more, under their sometimes boorish western neighbour.

We were shocked that the dominant emotion of West Berliners seemed not to be sympathy or compassion for those in the East for having the misfortune of living in a police state for the last 45 years, but rather that of pity or disgust. Time under Communism was seen as wasted time regardless of what people had spent their time doing. How were these poor Ossis going to cope under the so-called rigours of capitalism? Their experience under Communism was considered less than worthless. The failure of the Communist state became the failure of its citizens, regardless of whether they had participated in the repressive regime or not. Victim or oppressor, East Germany had instantly became a country full of losers.

In the West the fall of the Berlin Wall is usually portrayed as the Easterners rejecting Communism and accepting Capitalism wholeheartedly. Yet, at the time Easterners had little knowledge of the West and the West little real knowledge of the East. East and West Germany had grown apart in the intervening years and had developed strikingly distinct civic cultures.

Curiously, after the Wall, both sides took it as an article of faith that the model for both sides would be the Western model. This I believe was a mistake. A much happier outcome for both sides would have worked from the premise that despite the horrors of Communism, it was a bit insulting to assume that your marriage partner-to-be had lived a complete lie for the last half-century of her existence. The idea that the West had ‘won’ and that the East’s traditions were of no value lead to some humiliating and corrosive social policies. A stable and equitable union of different peoples should not have the flavour of a shot-gun wedding.

What then could have made the transitions less painful for the East? For one, there should have been negotiations in which both sides had some say about the direction the future union would take. They didn’t seem to take nearly long enough in creating a mutually agreeable ‘pre-nup.’ What could have been a joyous reunification of a divided country to me seemed more like a semi-hostile takeover of one country by another with little concern about the feelings of the weaker side. For some reason, at the time it seemed like most East Germans were fine with that. I suspect this was because they were so demoralized by their experience under Communism that they naively believed that the West held all the answers.

In the end, perhaps they shouldn’t have even joined together into a single state so quickly. If the Czechs and the Slovaks can live reasonably happily in separate countries, why not the East and West Germans? Union and amalgamation sometimes creates as many problems as it solves.

When we lived in Berlin in 1991 a young Ossi shopkeeper in Prenzlauer Berg asked what we thought of the East. We both replied that the Easterners seemed nicer–much more unassuming and gentle, while many West Germans seemed a bit too loud and arrogant for our taste. I think many people would have felt the same way if ideology were taken out of the equation and the rights and aspirations of ordinary citizens were taken into account. Just a little respect for the lives and traditions of the East by the West would have gone a long way in making German reunification more palatable and less painful for ordinary people.

Posted in Cities | Leave a comment

Evidence-Based Medicine

In Saturday’s’ Globe and Mail there was an interesting article by André Picard about the career of Dr. David Sackett, who pioneered the practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM). EBM promotes the idea that rather than just relying on tradition or expert opinion in medical diagnosis, the proper approach is to find available evidence and then attempt to apply it. This idea seems to make great deal of sense.

I knew little about EBM before I read the article, however, the concept of evidence-based practice (not necessarily as it applies to medicine) is something I have been thinking about for awhile. The EBM concept can probably be applied to all sorts of things.

EBM is based on the primacy of empirical findings, as opposed to other forms of reasoning. Evidence, as I understand it, forms the foundation of the scientific revolution of the 17th century, following the work of Francis Bacon, René Descartes and others. Evidence is at the root of science. If there is no empirical evidence then there is no science.

What was interesting about the article is that initially EBM was a controversial idea. It sounds like it remains controversial in some circles. This is surprising. Naively, you might think that EBM would be welcomed with open arms everywhere. For those with no background in medical diagnosis, it is difficult to conceive of a credible alternative to EBM.

Why then was EBM controversial? The article quotes Sackett:

“…all the old guys rejected it [EBM] because it challenged them. All the young guys loved it because it gave them a way to challenge their seniors in a more polite way, instead of telling them they were out of date. In addition, people who are wed to certain policies, if they have already decide what the answer is for an individual or a community, the last thing they want to hear or see is evidence.”

As Sackett suggests, some factors that may impinge on the rational aspects of scientific practice are patriarchy: older men wanting to maintain their authority regardless of the evidence; careerism: people wanting to promote their careers; and indulgence of egos: placing personal egos above efficacy of treatment or quality of ideas.

Scientists usually try to project an image of rationality–that the scientific method forces them to work strictly from available evidence. This is obviously an idealized portrayal of scientific practice. The work of Popper, Kuhn, and Feyerabend shows how scientific practice can be much messier than the idealized portrayal would suggest. For those familiar with the history of science, it should come as no surprise that people working within scientific domains can sometimes be no more scientific than any other segment of the population.

Scientific evidence often works against our intuition. Evidence can reveal the strangeness and unpredictability of the world. The way the world works is often more complicated than we we usually feel it should be. Truth can often be counter-intuitive. If you rely more on evidence rather than on preconceptions of what ought to be true, then you have to deal with a more complex world.

In addition, there is always the possibility that what you feel you ‘know’ is built on incorrect ideas or theories. In this case, in order to move forward you may have to takes several step backward and perhaps revise fundamental scientific theories. The history of science is not a linear, progressive cakewalk towards the truth: there may be lots of creative destruction along the way.

Most fields, whether scientific or not, depend on evidence to some degree. Architects bring in evidence that suggests their designs will help rather than harm the communities in which they are situated, politicians use evidence to corroborate that their policies will have good consequences rather than bad ones, business people use evidence that their business plans will end in profitability rather than bankruptcy.

In any field this evidence can be manipulated, misrepresented or simply disregarded. Quite often there is available evidence to inform a decision but there is little desire to search for this evidence if the evidence may prove inconvenient for preconceived policies. Scientists are not the only ones who can behave unscientifically.

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

Sesame Street meets VeggieTales

Elmo and the Pirate Pickle

Elmo and the Pirate Pickle

This year for Hallowe’en Ben decided to be a Pirate Pickle, while Liam dressed as the Sesame Street character Elmo.

Ben may have been inspired from the VeggieTales series, or he may have come up with the idea all by himself.

By dressing as Elmo, Liam was motivated by a desire to ‘leave childhood behind.’ We remain unclear how dressing up as Elmo will further this goal. Liam apparently doesn’t even like the Elmo character. We suspect he is working at an ironic level that is beyond our adult understanding.

The Pirate Pickle had been sprayed with an eco-friendly spray paint applied to bubble-wrap. This paint continues to flake off as we speak, while the Elmo costume was cleverly recycled from a cat costume. To maintain the Pickle’s bright green sheen (so it lasts until tomorrow) we may have to re-coat the pickle with eco-unfriendly paint, such as car enamel.

After much late-night handiwork by their mother Cornelia, Ben and Liam showed these costumes to their public this morning at school. When dropping off the boys at school it quickly became apparent that a Pirate Pickle held much more resonance with its Grade Four audience than did Elmo (which was discreetly stored in a plastic bag). Ben was like a rock star the instant he stepped out of the car [we chose to drive them to school because of the difficulties in transporting an over-sized Pirate Pickle by foot]. Ben hoisted his Pirate Pickle costume on a stick, like a medieval Crusader entering the gates of Jerusalem (which may be an appropriate simile given the Christian message behind the VeggieTales franchise).

Posted in Hamilton | Leave a comment

The Aldi model of retailing

While living in the Netherlands, we became familiar with the Aldi chain of discount grocery stores. Aldi is a German multinational, founded by the German billionaires Karl and Theo Albrecht. Aldi has stores in the States under the Aldi name and also has an up-market version called Trader Joe’s. Aldi is not yet in Canada but I expect they will eventually arrive here because their business model is so interesting and their groceries are so inexpensive. The nearest Aldi to us is in Niagara Falls, NY.

In North America, choice is important. If you want breakfast cereal, then the consumer is given dozens of choices of cereal — all supposedly differentiated from one another. In the Aldi world, this pattern is reversed and consumers are given extremely limited choice. In many product categories, there is only one offering. For example, if you want a dark chocolate bar, then there may be only be one dark chocolate bar on offer. The brand of this chocolate may not be familiar to you but usually the quality would be comparable, or superior, to brand-name products.

Definition of the Aldi Idea

The Aldi idea is that when shopping for groceries you don’t need to have the choice of dozens of similar goods; all you want is one quality product of at a reasonable price. As a result of this restriction of consumer choice Aldi can discount their prices (and reduce their costs) substantially.

The amount of groceries we could buy for 50 euros at Aldi in Rotterdam was substantial. As a result, grocery shopping for many items at Aldi seemed much more affordable than here in Canada. However, at Aldi the quality of fresh produce was much less than what we find at Lococo’s (a local Hamilton grocer).

The Aldi approach to retailing:

  • Shoppers don’t need a large choice within each product category; they just need one high-quality alternative at a reasonable price
  • Excessive choice, when it comes to groceries, does not bring happiness or empowerment, it brings confusion and unhappiness. This aligns with what the sociologist Barry Schwartz calls the Paradox of Choice
  • Brand-name products are no better than generic alternatives if the quality of the generics is equal or superior
  • Shopping at a discount grocery store is acceptable to shoppers of various incomes if the quality of the goods is not compromised
  • Rules of retailing common to North America can be completely reversed and yet still produce incredible profits for multinationals

Applying the Aldi Model to other areas

Here, More is Less

  • Corn-puff cereals
  • Formulaic pop songs
  • Sitcoms involving blended families
  • Cars on the road
  • People living on earth

Areas where the Aldi Model works less well

Here, More is More (or, the more the merrier)

  • Books, Ideas
  • Consumers for your books and ideas
  • Cool little shops in your neighbourhood
  • Keys you can play the piano in
  • Types of ethnic restaurants whose foods you enjoy
Posted in Green | Leave a comment

McMaster Innovation Park Open House

Introduction

Atrium in the Atrium building at MIP

Atrium of the Atrium building at MIP

The McMaster Innovation Park (MIP) had its official opening on October 26, 2009. I took a tour with several others and found the experience enjoyable and interesting.

MIP is a research park and technology transfer facility whose goal is to take technologies developed at McMaster University and transform them into viable businesses. MIP joins dozens of other university research parks in Canada.

The main building in which the opening took place will be known as the Atrium @ MIP. This renovated building was the former headquarters for the former Westinghouse/Camco facility. In the Atrium the commercialization firm Trivaris is an important tenant, under whose umbrella several local start ups have found support.

A new CANMET (Canadian Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology) building is under construction next door to the Atrium. In this new building CANMET’s Materials Technology Laboratory will be housed. This lab appears to be an excellent tenant and anchor for the MIP and will produce over a hundred high-quality research jobs. Such stable, federal agency jobs are a great find for Hamilton and may help turn this part of West Hamilton into a little slice of Ottawa or Kanata.

Observations

The Atrium is an attractively-renovated industrial building with a large, bright atrium. It appears to provide high-quality office and workshop space in a convenient location. The Atrium already houses several high-value and viable-sounding businesses.

The site plan for the MIP appears ambitious. It may take awhile to build out the entire MIP site since it offers lots of land for expansion. Its proximity to McMaster University, to attractive residential areas, and its convenient highway-side location are advantageous.

MIP represents the capital-intensive end of business development: the kind of innovation that requires significant investment from government, universities or venture capitalists to bring to fruition.

Currently, from an urban design perspective, MIP is relatively isolated from surrounding urban areas. If MIP’s site were connected to Frid St it would become much more accessible to the residential and industrial neighbourhoods that lie to the east.

The ideas that appear to motivate MIP are the following:

  • Utilize McMaster R&D as a business resource
  • Focus on areas for which McMaster has research expertise, such as engineering, material science and medical technology
  • Support, through R&D, traditional Hamilton industries such as manufacturing and steel production
  • Take an entrepreneurial approach to business development
  • Provide support and infrastructure to growing businesses
  • Follow a business development model of incubation, acceleration and ongoing support.

Some of these strategies rely on the prediction that manufacturing and steel production have a future in the region. This, I think is plausible, despite the fact that manufacturing and steel production in the region have been severely hit during the current recession.

I’m not sure, though, that all eggs should be placed in that one basket.

Innovation

The word ‘innovation’ takes on a slightly civic-booster quality at the MIP. When the word ‘innovation’ is used in a general, non-specific way it can become a motherhood-type issue that loses meaning and significance. The word ‘excellence’ is in a similar category: nice to have but just saying it doesn’t make it so.

Remember too that innovation is not always required to make money and to create employment. Stelco may not have been the most innovative steel producer in the world but it did employ many people.

If you are trying to establish a successful university research park, of course, what you profess to encourage is innovation. In all of the other university research parks in Canada innovation is also the method for creating value. But if everyone is doing it, then there is little differentiation from your competition.

Getting true innovation started in a place like MIP is tricky to design and depends on fortuitous blends of interesting research, discoveries that are commercial exploitable and the overall business and social climate in the region.

Innovation also depends on the type of people who end up working at MIP. If they are motivated, connected, well-trained and interesting then innovative work might result; or it might not. Innovation is a difficult quantity to conjure on demand.

In academic settings and in industry innovation is not always encouraged, but combining academic research with industrial production can be a potent combination, as witnessed by successful research parks near Stanford, MIT, Cambridge, Tokyo, etc.

Lacking a real insider’s perspective on what is going on at MIP, it is difficult to assess whether what I saw on the tour was innovative or not [with the exception of Crazy Daisy, a firm that links awareness of mental health issues with floral design--now that's a cool idea].

What MIP lacks

View from the Atrium building to CANMET

View from the Atrium building to CANMET

At MIP, there was little mention of green development or alternative technologies. Canada currently is very weak in these areas, despite the fact that green technologies will likely provide substantial future employment in all developed countries. It is this exclusion that makes the MIP seem much less interesting and progressive than it could have been.

At the MIP Opening there were few cultural, social or community aspects to the project beyond the display of art on the walls. The art I did see seemed like a token inclusion.

What would have been interesting is to see an art installation, involving technology found at MIP, that occupied the entire building atrium.

Technology and business development appear to be king at the MIP. It appears to be a button-down kind of place. Scruffy artist types, or grad students with wild hair were nowhere to be seen.

MIP is focused on domains such as material science and biomedical engineering. These are inherently less glamorous and engaging to the popular imagination than research areas such as media arts, green design, artificial intelligence, robotics, etc.

However, investment and employment growth do not always require glamour. Many cities earn lots of money working on the dullest things.

Posted in Cities, Hamilton | Leave a comment

Doors Open Smithville

Map of Smithville, ON

Location of Smithville, ON

The weekend of October 17-18, 2009 was the last weekend of Doors Open 2009 events in Ontario. The boys and I decided to visit the small town of Smithville, which is a small farming community on the upper plateau of the Niagara Escarpment about 12 kilometers south of Grimsby. In Smithville, among the open sites, were the Smithville Train Station and the Smithville Presbyterian Church.

Smithville Train Station

Smithville Train Station

Smithville Train Station

The Smithville Train Station was a typical Doors Open site with guides who explained how the train station served the town well over the years, next to the tracks of the T,H & B (Toronto, Hamilton and Buffalo) Railway, later  CP Rail.

The station had an attractive circular turret and an interior lovingly restored by the townspeople. It had been moved 50 feet from its previous location, which was directly adjacent to the tracks. Originally, the station had two waiting rooms, one called the Men’s Smoking Room and another for women, children and non-smokers. Each waiting room was heated by a pot-bellied stove.

The station did give the impression as being a special place of transition for the town. Most major arrivals and departures of the town occurred through the train station. It was where soldiers departed to fight in overseas wars and where farmers transported their goods to centres of population. You could imagine how immigrants felt when they hopped off the train at Smithville, to start a new life in the wilds of Canada.

The train station obviously holds great resonance for the town and many have devoted countless hours to its restoration. In the basement several women were busy maintaining the town archives. It was obvious that the people of Smithville were proud of their history and took it seriously.

A frequent lesson derived from attending Doors Open events is that maintaining a link to the past through architecture is a meaningful occupation and pastime for many. It adds meaning to their lives, and as a visitor it adds meaning to our lives as we witness people constructing meaning in theirs.

Smithville Presbyterian Church

Smithville Presbyterian Church

Smithville Presbyterian Church

The second site we visited, the Smithville Presbyterian Church turned out to be one of those special Doors Open sites in which we walked out feeling completely satisfied, indeed almost overwhelmed by the experience. With Doors Open, you never know quite what you are going to get and the visit to the Smithville Presbyterian Church was a prime example of this. We went in with no expectations and were rewarded with a rich, yet compact experience.

At the door, several friendly church women greeted us. We then proceeded to a display that honoured the men and boys who had left Smithville to fight in overseas wars. Included was a display of military rifles with fixed bayonets, which greatly impressed the boys.

Later, I spoke with two church elders [meaning, a couple of guys about my age] about the history of the Presbyterian Church, its origins in Scotland and how branches of this Protestant denomination went through a dizzying array of splits, secessions and mergers.

In the 19th century the Presbyterian Church was the most important Protestant denomination in English Canada. Many parts of English Canada were settled by people of Scottish descent. Usually these Scots were Protestants. Scottish Protestants built some very handsome limestone and brick churches in Ontario, like the one in Smithville.

Then we discussed the architectural history of the main Presbyterian churches in nearby Hamilton. There are three important Presbyterian churches in Hamilton: St Paul’s Presbyterian on James St South at Jackson, MacNab Street Presbyterian on MacNab near the train tracks, and the large Central Presbyterian at Charlton and Caroline. Central seems to be the largest of the three and the one most successful in maintaining a healthy congregation. All three are architecturally and culturally significant and are well worth a visit during Doors Open events. The stained glass windows in St Paul’s and MacNab are particularly noteworthy.

An important event, apparently, in Presbyterian Church history, was the formation of the United Church of Church in 1925. The majority of Presbyterians at that time decided to join the new church.  But some decided not to join and remained as Presbyterians. It is unclear what sorts of people stayed compared to those who left.

I think it is this aspect that makes the history of the Presbyterian Church in Canada difficult for outsiders to comprehend. Like in many Doors Open events, a glimpse is given of a world you realize you know next to nothing about.

After my discussions with the elders, I had several questions which would have taken them a long time to explain to me adequately:

  • How did the Scottish Protestant church relate to the Roman Catholic church at the time of the Reformation–why were the ideas of John Knox or John Calvin so revolutionary at the time?
  • What issues of faith and worship inspired factions to break away from established Protestant churches?
  • What did the formation of the United Church of Canada mean to the established churches of the time?
  • What sorts of Presbyterians decided not to join the United Church of Canada?

I guess what I’m looking for is a book called a Scottish Protestantism in Canada for Dummies that might explain these issues for me.

After my discussion of church history with the elders, which lasted some time, some other women demonstrated the beautiful late-Victorian pipe organ, built by Edward Lye & Sons, which has been in continuous operation since 1891. The boys had a great time working the manual bellows (an electric blower was later installed) and in pounding the keyboard of this organ. Liam was especially impressed by the organ’s foot pedals and how it was possible to play a tune just by using your feet.

Since the organ still has manual bellows it can be played without electrical power–as happened during a concert in the middle of a power outage in 1999. The majestic sound coming from a church organ was impressive. The organ and its lore occupied the boys for a long time and I think it will be something they remember.

Lastly, the event which cemented this visit as being an important event in Doors Open for us (and the last event we attended in 2009) was the free lunch given by the church ladies in the second floor balcony. There, the boys and I could choose from four different types of soup, eat as many sandwiches and dessert squares as we wanted, drink pots of coffee, tea or juice, all for free. There is little that gives a more positive impression for the boys and me than tasty, free food.

At Smithville Presbyterian Church we got to enjoy interesting church history, play with on an historic church organ and then get a full meal at the end of it. This hospitality we found was almost overwhelming. It was an excellent advertisement for small-town Presbyterianism as a purveyor of local history and as a place to find a warm, supportive community.

Despite its cultural attractions, there is a sense that this church community is in decline. Enrolment is declining precipitously in mainstream Protestant churches in Canada. There seems to be a lack of young people required to sustain these communities in the years ahead.

Many potential church-goers are probably happy to visit church buildings and to participate in a supportive community, but lack the Christian faith needed to worship in a Christian church.

But, we didn’t get the impression that the people we met at the Smithville Presbyterian Church were friendly to outsiders because of their possibly declining congregation–we got the impression that this was just the way they behaved.

Posted in Art Crawls | Leave a comment

First Hamilton Supercrawl

I eagerly anticipated the James St Supercrawl held Friday Oct 9, 2009. Unfortunately, the weather didn’t cooperate in the least. It was raining heavily all day. After listening to music for a short time at the Supercrawl and visiting a couple of galleries, I walked home because I was getting cold. I have heard from others that it was a good party. I had obviously left much too early.

For the Supercrawl, James St North was closed to traffic between York/Wilson and Cannon. This moved the centre of gravity of the event a couple blocks south. Usually, most Art Crawl action happens between Cannon and Barton. Moving it southwards made the Sonic Unyon building on Wilson feel more central, which during normal crawls feels like an outlier. Several live music stages had been set up. Covered stages were necessary that night because otherwise musicians and equipment would have become completely drenched. The wet weather discouraged crawling along James St. It appeared that fewer galleries than normal were open. The Loose Canon Gallery, as is usually the case, had some of the most interesting art on display. The you me gallery, which is often our first port of call, was closed.

The Art Crawl is primarily a linear event, much like that portion of Nuit Blanche that runs along Queen St West in Toronto. On the strip lots is going on. Off the strip the neighbourhoods are quiet. In my opinion the Art Crawl should include more of James Street, both North and South. It should stretch all the way between Liuna Station at Murray to St Joseph’s Hospital. It this way it would include most of the urban highlights of downtown Hamilton, including Gore Park. The Art Crawl has a way to go before there are sufficient attractions to encourage people to tramp all this way, but one can dream.

To attract crowds to the Supercrawl (which it sounds like they were successful in doing) live music became the main attraction. Overall, this made it less of an art-focused event. This may have been because of the weather or it may have been by design. Although live music is enjoyable to see anywhere in the city (the Locke St Festival is especially good in this respect) I’m not sure how successfully live music on fixed stages relates to the pedestrian movement inherent to an Art Crawl. With an Art Crawl you want people to promenade and explore art venues; with fixed music stages you want people to stop and listen to music. Therefore, the Supercrawl for me was like a regular Art Crawl, but with less crawling and less art.

Posted in Art Crawls, Hamilton | Leave a comment

Participatory art: loot conquers all

Cornelia and her participatory art event during Nuit Blanche, Toronto

Cornelia and her participatory art event during Nuit Blanche, Toronto

During last Saturday’s Nuit Blanche in Toronto, my wife Cornelia Peckart taught me some interesting lessons about participatory art events and art ‘happenings.’

Cornelia’s idea was to create an art event that involved people walking by, in which participants were rewarded for their participation. The reward was a ‘loot bag,’ much like those given out at children’s birthday parties. The event in which people were encouraged to participate involved drawing with chalk on the brick wall along the east side of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, at the corner of Queen St West and Shaw in Toronto. Prior to the event, Cornelia did not request permission from the institution to chalk up their wall (it is easier to ask forgiveness than to get permission).

The event was almost completely spontaneous. Cornelia didn’t know if she would have enough nerve to go through with it just moments before she set up and began to rally the crowds. She didn’t know where she would set up until she happened to see an available wall. The time from when the project was first conceived to when it occurred was very short–only a few hours. Due to the enthusiasm of Cornelia, which is usually seen as a gift given freely, the event was a success. My role was as the event photographer. It was fun for me as well.

Here are some of the lessons I learned, which I believe are applicable to a wider context:

Tangible rewards encourage participation

People who are accosted and asked to participate in an art happening during events like Nuit Blanche may be reluctant to do so unless they are assured of a few things: that they will not be too embarrassed by the experience, that they will probably have some fun, and that there is some tangible award for participating (although this reward need not be substantial). Having this reward made the difference between people walking by and people deciding to take part.

Crowds can form and disperse very quickly

Crowd scene

Crowd scene at Queen and Shaw, Toronto

One the most interesting aspects of the experience was just how quickly crowds formed once people figured out that something was going on. It didn’t require a long build-up time or an organic period of growth. It happened almost instantly and it disappeared just as quickly as it appeared. It was a completely ephemeral event. It took about 45 minutes from start to finish. Once all the loot bags were given out then the event was over and no one knew that anything had happened, besides chalk scratchings on the wall. Despite this ephemeral quality we got the sense that people valued their participation, that their interaction was meaningful to them and their apparent enjoyment was genuine. After the event, we continued on our way and explored more of Nuit Blanche, like nothing had happened.

The Power of Charisma

One of the reasons that the event was a success was that Cornelia was charismatic and attracted a crowd, simply through her interactions and presence. This factor was crucial. This skill in rallying crowds quickly is found in few people. If I had attempted a similar event it wouldn’t have worked at all.

When it comes to art events, appeals to reason are often much less powerful than appeals to having fun and getting a little bit of loot.

PA045090PA045093Cornelia is gone

Posted in Art Crawls | 3 Comments